What were the main points of the Webster Hayne Debates?

Hayne of South Carolina. It was motivated by a dispute over the continued sale of western lands, an important source of revenue for the federal government. While the debaters argued about slavery, the economy, protection tariffs, and western land, the real implication was the meaning of the United States Constitution.

Who won the Webster Haynes debate?

Most of them pronounced Webster the winner of the debate and were cheered by his apologia for National Republican constitutionalism. New Englanders of this party had the opinion that Webster had ably defended their region and severely struck the South.

Why did Daniel Webster agree to compromise on the issue of slavery?

Webster viewed slavery as a matter of historical reality rather than moral principle. He argued that the issue of its existence in the territories had been settled long ago when Congress prohibited slavery in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 and divided regions into slave and free in the 1820 Missouri Compromise.

How did Daniel Webster interpret the Constitution?

In Webster’s view, the fundamental question was: “Whose prerogative is it to decide on the constitutionality or unconstitutionality of the laws?” He held that the Constitution of the United States “confers on the Government itself, to be exercised by its appropriate Department, and under its responsibility to the …

What was Webster’s response Hayne?

Daniel Webster rose to Hayne’s challenge. In a packed Senate Chamber, Webster used his organ-like voice to great effect as he began a two-day speech known as his Second Reply to Hayne. When Webster asked the South Carolina senator how he was doing, Hayne relied, “None the better for you, sir.”

How did President Jackson ease the nullification crisis?

On December 10, 1832, President Andrew Jackson issued a Proclamation to the People of South Carolina (also known as the “Nullification Proclamation”) that disputed a states’ right to nullify a federal law. The Compromise Tariff of 1833 was eventually accepted by South Carolina and ended the nullification crisis.

What did Daniel Webster argue?

2 days ago
Maryland (1819) he contended that a state could not tax a federal agency (a branch of the Bank of the United States), for the power to tax was a “power to destroy.” In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) he argued that a state could not encroach upon the congressional power to regulate interstate commerce.

What did Daniel Webster support?

American statesman Daniel Webster (1782-1852) earned fame for his staunch support of the federal government and his skills as an orator. As U.S. secretary of state, he helped ease border tensions with Britain through negotiations of the Webster-Ashburton Treaty in 1842. …

Did Daniel Webster favor tariffs?

He was a prominent opponent of the Republican embargo and the War of 1812 and was elected to the House of Representatives from Boston, serving from 1823 to 1827, and then to the Senate in 1827. He opposed the protective tariff from 1816 to 1824 but voted for the tariff act of 1828.

What is the significance of the Webster-Hayne debate?

The Webster–Hayne debate was a famous debate in the United States between Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Senator Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of protectionist tariffs.

How did webwebster respond to a charge that was baseless?

Webster replied to his speech the next day, and left not a shred of the charge, baseless as it was.

What was the main idea of Webster’s speech?

Though Webster made an impassioned argument, the political, social, and economic traditions of New England informed his ideas about the threatened nation. Even more pointedly, his speech reflected a decade of arguments from other Massachusetts conservatives who argued against supposed threats to New England’s social order.